(Untitled)

Jan 18, 2007 22:03

the following footnote appears in this particular incarnation of my paper. i think it's probaby a bad idea, but i totally don't know how else to say it.
see under the cut for mel's idiot moment )

Leave a comment

Comments 2

dimpled_infamy January 19 2007, 04:16:23 UTC
For what it is worth, I completely agree with the sentiment of the footnote.

Reply


bowenfiredragon January 19 2007, 23:42:19 UTC
I also completely agree, however I would be rather more viscious. Simply put, Derrida's reading of Lacan is nothing more than shear anthropomorphisim, masquarading as "animal rights". To project "human" values, abilities and cognition is to view the animal through the human and the human only. I think your racial commentary is rather good. Nifty!

Reply


Leave a comment

Up