This topic came up, and I was kinda curious as to how everyone else viewed it as well. My question is, when it comes to the morality of this show how do you, as a viewer, see it? Is it different than what you expected? And if so, how
(
Read more... )
Comments 9
(The comment has been removed)
See, I think that Clark has been moral ambiguous, and the show has recognized it. I don't think they want Clark being a "white hat" so much because I do think it contradicts what the dicotomy of the Clex relationship they set out to show.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Exactly, and I think this says a lot for his compassion.
//The availability of the essential choice is *not* at all unique to Clark, it's there for *everyone* to make--it is Clark who is the unique factor here, willingly assuming that massive responsibility. //
This is an *excellent* point. The chance of devoting your life to helping others isn't really a new concept. However, very few choose to do so, and that's what makes Clark's choice so epic, moving, and selfless.
Reply
I really can't take the Kent's seriously in that respect, although the younger characters are allowed to be more interestingly flawed obviously
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment