So, so, so. I've been thinking about that blurb while I was gone. Thanks to those who think of me and message me, while I am gone. At the moment, I think of you all regularly, because the wili wili flower grows by our clothesline and it's in bloom. I see what I consider the peculiar red flower Eric gave to Sookie and think of my lovely friends.
(
Read more... )
Comments 28
Now I'm thinking it just might have to do with murder of a child. I brushed that off when it crossed my mind. Thinking would she write that. Now thinking, Yeah she would. She wrote Dead and Gone the torture that Sookie went through. Crystal and Claudine killed both being pregnant. Holly's son being abducted. Also had the threat the witches put on Holly. They would hurt her family.
Reply
CH would have no problems killing a kid - mainly because it's the height of emotional stress, while being no physical stress. She can't leave the books with a little whimper of an issue. It's not like torture, where we have to know if Sookie's alright afterwards.
Reply
Reply
The above post is also me, ~ Toonsie
Reply
:D Your IP is the same with the two posts. :D
Reply
Reply
Building on that, I got to thinking about how in the very first book, Sookie worked to exonerate Jason when he was a logical suspect. Could his recent growth lead him to return the favor? Could those efforts then be what leads to Jason's death (rather than the more expected shifter bit)? Could Jason have to suck it up and work with the vampires to help Sookie? It seems like a nice bookend to the first book to have him parallel her efforts. Hmmm.
Reply
I think Jason would actually put in some work to protect Sookie. He'd be pretty damn outraged that someone would accuse her of that. And he's already had that stouch with Arlene in Merlotte's at the Were Reveal. And while he's not 100% (he doesn't want her spewing her guts up in his beloved truck) I think that he would definitely stand up for her. I think Michele would bully the hell out of him anyway - she's really friendly with Sookie. :D
Reply
I think whatever happens, though, it'll involve Arlene and the FOTS, and if her kid/s is/are sacrificed then she'll end the series as a nice counterpoint to Sookie - the woman who lost everything, as opposed to the woman who has gained so much.
Ooshka
Reply
I think it would make a nice parallel - Arlene who was always willing to do what her boyfriend said, even at the cost of her fellow humans, as opposed to Sookie who stood up for what she thought, and her own race. I doubt it'd get through the thick heads of some of the fangirls who just want her to abdicate thinking to the favoured man, but it might persuade some.
Reply
This might be the only way of finally getting through to Arlene and offering her a chance at redemption. She's sacrificed her identity, her friends, her job, her decency, all for the sake of love - not love for these men, but for her kids. Losing one or both of the children would be incredibly ironic, but in a fucked up way, justThis is a great final solution to the FotS, too. Generally, the only time governments will step in when it comes to fanatics or cults is when they can prove child abuse. Granted, this isn't the kind of systematic scenario we usually see but as it comes on the heels of Rhodes, and as there are g-men involved in the story ( ... )
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment