I promised you all 12 hours. But I slightly lied because I found out that transferring stuff from Google docs over to LJ html makes for some fucked up html. I had to clean that shit up otherwise this post would look like crap. Oh - and I forgot to mention yesterday - I watched a whole 10 minutes of True Blood Season 6 this year. By God, what I saw
(
Read more... )
Comments 43
This is going to be a super-long comment (I might have to separate it), and I apologize for that. You know I love your writing here, and agree with so much of what you've said, I just disagree extremely strongly about this.
Let me put my disagreement in context by saying that they are rooted in my identity and experiences as a bisexual, mixed ethnicity person born and raised in the American southeast. Not that this makes me the final authority, but I want it understood that this is not an "I have gay friends" situation for me. It's one I felt viscerally, as predictable repetition of a lifetime of experiencing intolerance. It resonated, and not in a good way.
To begin, I should say that I don't attribute any of the stereotypes and prejudices I see in this series to Sookie as a character, I attribute them to Charlaine Harris. Perhaps wrongly, but where underlying biases are revealed in the text, the handling of them leads me only to conclude that a) CH intended to write Sookie - our thoughtful and gracious host for this fictional ( ... )
Reply
And no, Sookie choosing a shifter doesn’t cut back on the diversity, but it happens in a context in which Weres are in Congress and pure shifters are unknown simply because they have been better at “passing” as human. CH made a choice to make Weres/shifters closer to human in being somewhat readable to Sookie as well. She made choices that showed us that shifters/Weres were a little less “abnormal” than the vamps. The idea that successful long-term “passing” as as close to human as possible is of benefit to the non-humans is an easily recognizable and abhorrent metaphor for how lgbt people are treated and expected to suppress their own identities - and CH never gives us the idea, via Sookie, that she is the least bit critical of this idea.
CH made a choice to make Tyrese’s love HIV positive and also predatory in giving him HIV - and if you cross this HIV stigma with the read of the books’ predatory vampires as a queer metaphor, things start to get really gross. CH made a choice to make vampires of color get lighter skinned over time ( ... )
Reply
Reply
Reply
You make interesting points. I'd never have thought of HP as being about WWII... Need to look into that.
As you know, I'm always frustrated by the lack of willingness to accept that Eric's sexuality is "fluid". But whether the books are a good representation of tolerance or not, they've certainly highlighted the impressive lack of it from women for women. As one of my friends at work says: Sad times!
Reply
It's in the bits I linked. It was pretty deliberate by JKR - with the whole pureblood for Jews, and she talks about that in the interviews.
I know! I was searching for a link and I had to search for "eric is totally not gay", because I remember saying that to you. :D It's definitely sad times. But I could rant on that for forever and a day, so I'll stop now. :D
Reply
Reply
You're doing better than me (mea culpa five months) and with the articles being there for so long after book release, I'm sure they won't disappear any time soon. JKR did talk about it a fair bit, about the effect it had on British people. The bit that always struck me was the similarity between Voldemort and Hitler is that both of them were not themselves the ideal perfect German/wizard they had in mind for everyone else.
He could never like a man at all. He would totally not even *look* at a man if not for Sookie. He's doing it out of luuurve for Sookie, and is secretly disgusted.
Lol. I hate you. :D
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
I think it would have weakened it as well if she became just suddenly able to accommodate a violent lifestyle.
Reply
AoifeNZ
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
I'd written something much longer, but basically the only people who got happy endings were those who stuck to the surface-same. I include Sookie and Sam in this. Both are rare varieties of supes that do not embrace their supe-sides very much, and mostly desire to live human lives.
Pretty much everybody who tried to dabble in a 'mixed' relationship came out the worse for it.
Because of this, a lot of people perceived that the takeaway (or throwaway) message was that it's not who you are but *what* you are that ultimately matters.
I think the only message that CH was trying to convey is that couples need deep-seated commonalities to function effectively in the long term -- the problem is that this got in the way of the gay/minority metaphor, bigtime.
Reply
Leave a comment