(Untitled)

Sep 18, 2005 22:47

Bush sucks. Is it so much to ask that religion and government are separate?

I think this person says it best:

"Americans are free to pray or not to pray, but it is not the business of our U.S. president to direct citizens to pray."

In related news, I just registered (online!) to vote in CA (I guess I should really get a CA license sometime,

Leave a comment

Comments 6

ninaf September 19 2005, 06:21:45 UTC
yay for voting! I voted today.

Reply


codepoet September 19 2005, 06:37:00 UTC
George Washington disagrees.

Besides, the wording of the first amendment is that "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof..." - Strictly speaking, the executive branch has no such limitation.

Finally, since he wasn't encouraging any specific type of prayer, I doubt this would violate a prohibition to "respect an establishment of religion" (such as the rise of the Anglican church).

Reply

petef September 19 2005, 06:55:32 UTC
Law or not, I don't think it's appropriate. I've got nothing wrong with people who choose to pray (to whomever or whatever) - but not everyone chooses or agrees with this. I think every time I hear Bush speak, he says "God bless something..." - he's free to pray on his own, but it's not appropriate when making a statement that represents the united states.

There was no type of prayer specified, but the act of prayer implies something (belief in some higher power/deity/whatever) which may or may not reflect everyone's beliefs.

Reply

codepoet September 19 2005, 18:52:41 UTC
If anyhting, Bush's Christian speaking seems toned down from Washington's speech - Do you think it was inappropriate for him to declare Thanksgiving in the terms that he used?

(Yes, I actually am curious.)

Reply

petef September 19 2005, 21:04:42 UTC
I agree, but I don't think Washington's speech is at all appropriate for today (maybe it was for the time). Lots of things change in a couple hundred years.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up