On a vaguely related note, I would like to punch the gender binary in the face a lot
A lot of people know the Kinsey scale (a numeric representation of sexual orientation, with 1 being totally straight, 7 being completely gay, and everything else in the middle), but I've always felt it to be lacking and too stark a simplification of human sexuality. So I made this.
A slightly less binaric version of the Kinsey Scale, if you will. There are two markers: one for sexual preference and one for romantic, and it runs from male to female (to pan) and sexual/romantic to asexual/aromantic.
I think that's everything. If anyone can think of anything that would make this a more accurate quanitative represenation of the (incredibly flucatative, hard to follow, and impossible to pin down) range of human sexuality, please tell me! :3
(Those two dots on the far right are my own markers, for demostration. :D)
A slightly less binaric version of the Kinsey Scale, if you will. There are two markers: one for sexual preference and one for romantic, and it runs from male to female (to pan) and sexual/romantic to asexual/aromantic.
I think that's everything. If anyone can think of anything that would make this a more accurate quanitative represenation of the (incredibly flucatative, hard to follow, and impossible to pin down) range of human sexuality, please tell me! :3
(Those two dots on the far right are my own markers, for demostration. :D)