hello

Jun 05, 2007 19:13

Hello
Im here only becouse one interesting person I`ve met at L.A.
I wont be posting much, I usually dont have much to say  in public:)

Leave a comment

Comments 7

koralgol June 5 2007, 19:50:24 UTC
hello Terry *hugs*
nice to know you manage to break through and make an account here :) it would be helpfull, you see, if you have a questions, do not hesistate to ask:)

Reply

pietit_theresa June 8 2007, 05:55:55 UTC
yeah :) we are almost all gathered in here, just Cecily and Georg are missing now but they have workloads at the moment.
hello K *hugs* you werent yesterday available, or you feeling ill like viator?
It would be disastrous, another person working as a discussion provider, wont show...well, we manage, but we miss ya :)

Reply


cecilytheotocos June 9 2007, 16:10:29 UTC
Hey, Terry :) *hugs*
Good to see almost everyone is in here now :P Its a bit uncommon for us to be at one time at the same comm, but with this kind of invitation, I couldnt resist:)
Say, you have this Kracauer about Cult of Distraction? I lost my version and v took it off and went somewhere...

Reply

pietit_theresa June 11 2007, 12:01:58 UTC
*hugs back*
Gosh, what a terrible heat we have =_=;
Good that at night we have better athmosphere to discuss XD btw, your articule about Welsch and his theopry about multiculture is rather twisty, yet genious :) can I have a source Virillo you quoted?

Reply

daniel_lemod June 12 2007, 06:30:07 UTC
Well, I agree that Virillio usage was a good trick, but what about italiani? Vilio and others, cyberspace, fucked in the head theorethics of making leasure time? I get this crazy huntch that they were writing being awfully waisted. Terms just dont fit to the definitions, moreover they are quite confidet that nobody read Marx right, but there are a few nice rethrospevtives...

Sorry for badgering you lj Terry :) I just have the uge to dwell over our late night topic :)

Reply

koralgol June 12 2007, 16:48:17 UTC
Hey :) Daniel, you arent structuralist under cover, are you? :)nowodays it is common to take anything with anything , but only when methodological instruments are ready, and they arent ready ever. Becouse changes are going to fast, and too fast something become history but its too close to us to compare. Remember our exchange when I quoted thing about computer archelology? about Windows 01? well, we dont and we wont be having ready, unchangable theories.
Some people are terrified by that, some are happy. Im distanced, but I see future in this way :)

Reply


Leave a comment

Up