(Untitled)

[pink_sazzle]

Water is ur friend

Comments

[cholasthehedge]

I think the insurance people would say that the person with the broken lights is at fault. Otherwise it's always the fault of the person behind, for travelling too close.

[jickle]

I think it's possible both parties would be considered at fault. But the person who was behind probably wouldn't be considered *as* at fault.

That kinda shit is probably on the internet somewhere.

[cholasthehedge]

Who told you that?

A MONKEY?!

[red_chirper]

I think you'll all find it's illegal to drive without brake lights in the first place.

[jazzcrime]

if you rear end them who's to say their brake lights weren't fucked up from you slamming into the back of them? i think its probably the driver behinds fault still... as unjust as it is.

[pink_sazzle]

true that.... but thats fucked though if someone lied about that... but then again they would be in a lot of trouble if they didnt lie... but still lying is wrong! that would shit me off so much if i went into the back of him and then he was all... my brake lights work.. she broked that... i would scream.... very loudly!

[matts_crads]

so u ran into a car?

[pink_sazzle]

not quite