(Untitled)

Jul 12, 2007 00:25

While I haven't really posted about me... things worth noting about e3... it sucked.. big time ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

Comments 4

shaleari July 12 2007, 05:38:52 UTC
There is a differnce. These classifications are about the different audiences and expectations. There is the "Core" gamer. There is the Mass, and there is the casual. Nintendogs isn't a hardcore game. Why? Because despite not being able to leave it alone, there is not stratagy. There will be no speed run for Nintendogs ( ... )

Reply

pkgingo July 12 2007, 05:48:38 UTC
Thats what I mean, why do they not STOP making LAUNCH 360s and make ONLY falcon if the launch models suck so badly...

Yes I understand generalizations are not 100%, but I would argue there IS strategy in Nintendogs... there cant be an ending, but you can speedrun through all events. I didnt say COD4 was a WW2 shooter, but the others were, I was more refering to medal of honor... TO me, in those games, theres no strategy, just look, aim, fire.

Then again, this is my opinion and it irks me to have people classify something with a label thats not at all accurate. If I could, I would relabel all hardcore games as immature....

Reply

pkgingo July 12 2007, 13:29:48 UTC
Forgot to mention MP8 was developed by Hudson... probably the reason it sucks so bad in the non finished sense. Every other iteration of the series looks and feels WAY more complete than that. Even the GAB one...

Reply


yukineko July 16 2007, 08:25:18 UTC
Owning a dog is so casual. Owning a pack of wolves on the other hand, now, that's hardcore.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up