(Untitled)

Jun 21, 2007 01:34


Read more... )

Leave a comment

Comments 23

purdier June 21 2007, 02:53:44 UTC
the more i look at it the more i just don't get it. in what way are they Global Warming Ready? the sunscreen? and...and how does it make you want to buy clothes. someone explain it to me

Reply

eyes_of_old June 21 2007, 07:55:28 UTC
I don't get it either. How in the hell are jeans going to make you Global Warming Ready? You get sweaty in them really easy, which make you irritable and NOT all 'Why hello, Mr Palm Tree'. They are extremly difficult to swim in so I have no idea why they are at the beach.

Bah!

Reply

pock_marked June 22 2007, 16:14:02 UTC
Well, they are "ready" for Global Warming with their sexy, sexxy, sexxxy clothing line and their "devil may care" attitude. The world may be fucked, but surf's up, ladies.

Reply


alacarta_renata June 21 2007, 03:03:18 UTC
Ooh that does make me angry stupid stupid mindless rubbish ads. Fuck.

Reply

pock_marked June 22 2007, 16:14:30 UTC
Fuck, indeed.

Reply


mr_funktastic June 21 2007, 04:46:58 UTC
You know the first thing I noticed was the whole R Kelly vibe from the second picture.

Pods will back me up on this one but it all depends on the context. Someone like me would look at the second picture and think 'why couldn't they just align the horizon correctly? seriously; image-rotate-clockwise 0.3 degrees, it would take ten seconds. Fuck you people.'.

Kevin Costner might look at it and see dry land.

Someone else might look at it and see god's greater glory (even statues of jesus can walk on water).

An auschwitz survivor might look at that picture and have flashbacks. It all depends on the viewer.

Obviously the images are unrealistic. I mean if someone did build a causeway to George Washington's face there would undoubtedly be a hitler moustache painted on his upper lip. C'mon peoples, this is common sense stuff.

Reply

pock_marked June 22 2007, 16:49:37 UTC
Thank you for making the Waterworld reference.

It needed to be done.

Reply


kidness June 21 2007, 07:36:40 UTC
Jesus I did not need to see these as I scrolled down my friend's page.

I love the really subtle phallic trees. BUT WHAT ARE THEY IMPLYING?? I don't doubt for a second that the water spurting is a CONSCIOUS reference to most popular way to end porn films, 'facials', either. And I think you mean today's sassy, skinny, always sexxxxy, always submissive lady.

I'm reading the Feminine Mystique at the moment and the chapter 'The Sexual Sell' about advertising.. yeah it made me hate humans a little more. It's about advertising directed at housewives but it's not hard to extrapolate that to what advertising execs (Friedan calls them 'manipulators') are saying about the young sexxxxy crowd.

Reply

pock_marked June 22 2007, 16:23:44 UTC
Yeah.. it's pretty subtle. i mean, what the hell could the SMEARING of WHITE CREAM ACROSS HER BACK AS SHE POSITIONS HER ARSE NEAR HIS CROTCH possibly be relative to? Non non non non... she just really needs some sunscreen applied, as we all do, especially at dusk.

Reply


therhythmthief June 21 2007, 12:51:04 UTC
Tom. Stop making me think so much. It's holidays!

Reply

pock_marked June 22 2007, 16:24:24 UTC
You're getting a book for your birthday. WITH NO PICTURES, JODY.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up