grr

Jun 13, 2005 17:20

ooh! that fucker got off. acquitted ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

Comments 4

gaelfarce June 13 2005, 22:40:26 UTC
That is some bullshit. I was figuring once the jury took so long to deliberate that something had gone wrong. I also feel that he did some serious misconduct there. But I also feel that the prosecution really didn't have too much on him that was concrete.

Reply


ferr June 13 2005, 23:01:18 UTC
Well what do you expect, innocent unless you aren't famous. That is the California judicial system.

Reply


abstractform June 14 2005, 06:18:05 UTC
Personally, I thought early on that the way Jackson's defense included so many famous people who didn't really know the guy suspect. I smell all kinds of rats.

And the judge didn't get him to speak? I've experienced firsthand how getting the defendant to speak for themselves in court can really take the mask off. Any rich guy can hire a lawyer to say all the right words.

What a crock.

Reply


ex_cloaked902 June 14 2005, 21:09:37 UTC
They just didn't have enough evidence. Whether or not he was guilty.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up