Is it just me that finds it abhorrent that we live in a society that can jail a man for 3 years for possession of knowledge.
Irrespective of his views or his intention, what
this man was actually jailed for was “possessing documents likely to be useful to a terrorist”, ie possession of books and a blueprint. He had not attempted to blow anything up
(
Read more... )
Comments 11
Reply
Reply
Perhaps it is our civic duty to all possess documents that could be useful to terrorists (like maps of the London underground, perhaps, or blueprints for a 747) in order to see how far these ludicrous pro-terror laws (because, frankly, the legislative hysteria going on over the last few years can only have enhanced the sense of terror in the general population) will be pushed.
Reply
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Yes it could be argued that the Internet was there however thats not what the judge said while passing sentence so its more a case (or appears to be ) ooh you have something that looks a bit iffy your nicked .(Many precedents from WWII with regards this , however they generally tried them on espionage charges)
Reply
I agree that he was probably considering trying to become a terrorist, but there is a long way to travel between the thought and the deed.
Owning a Bible doesn't make me a practising Christian.
Owning John Norman's "Slave Girl of Gor" does not make me a rapist.
(Just for Clarity: the latter of these comments is for illustration only. I do not, have not, and do not intend to ever own a copy of Slave Girl of Gor")
Reply
Leave a comment