Mad cows, mad Americans

Jul 25, 2005 21:13

U.S. court says judge erred in keeping Canadian cattle out

No shit.

In a 56-page written opinion, the appeal court judges disputed that claim, suggesting that Cebull had been swayed by R-CALF's experts without properly considering the judgment and expertise of the USDA.Okay, you're a judge from Montana, a state that has a lot of cattle ranchers. ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

Comments 13

ardin_resolute July 26 2005, 03:09:20 UTC
I think bias is the word. More so than either corrupt or incompetent. He might see his job as to uphold American values which including defending American interests.

Reply

polkaroo79 July 26 2005, 03:29:52 UTC
Yeah, but judges overturned it, calling it deeply flawed. His job is to interpret the law, not uphold American values, including defending American interests.

One could even question the American interests bit. Is he really protecting Americans? Or is he protecting American cattle ranchers at the expense of the rest of the population paying more for cattle prices? Which is more important in the argument of protecting "American interests?"

What happened was wrong. The USDA even recognizes that.

Reply

anidada July 26 2005, 14:50:18 UTC
Let's hope Canadian farmers sue the pants off 'em. (If that's even possible.)

Reply

polkaroo79 July 26 2005, 15:17:48 UTC
I wouldn't mind them doing it for attention, but I doubt it'd amount to much. I mean how many times has NAFTA/WTO ruled against America in the softwood lumber issue? And they STILL ignore it. They'd prolly just do the same with the lawsuit. Bastards.

Reply


siobhan63 July 26 2005, 11:16:16 UTC
Which is why judges shouldn't be elected...

Reply

polkaroo79 July 26 2005, 13:17:40 UTC
Geebus. I forgot they do that over there. This explains much.

Reply

anidada July 26 2005, 14:51:03 UTC
Amen. Nor sheriffs, nor district attorneys, for that matter.

Reply

polkaroo79 July 26 2005, 18:21:54 UTC
Nor presidents apparently ;)

Reply


allhatnocattle July 27 2005, 06:14:22 UTC
I don't want to look into this too deeply for fear I'll overheat.

But really, the cattle ban was actually good for an industry that had been complacent with getting the easy money. 20years ago when Mulroney opened up beef imports from Argentina, Australia, etc and liberalized cattle trade between the USA and Canada, a strange side effect occured. We stopped exporting and instead turned to the eliminated border. Cattle crossed the 49th sometimes 4-5 times a year in search of cheap grain, etc. Many of our facilities here closed as it was just more economical to use American ones (where wages are less then our minimum).

Something you may not have heard is that Tyson and Lakeside are about to go on strike. This, right after the border opens. Tyson is American owned. Where Lakeside is out of Quebec (I believe). http://www.vivelecanada.ca/article.php/20050714113633322

Reply

polkaroo79 July 27 2005, 14:04:41 UTC
Kinda reminds me of how the low loonie made the manufacturing sector lazy cuz they were getting lots of contracts without having to be innovative or efficient.

I actually did hear about the Tyson/Lakeside thing, I think on siobhan63's site.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up