U.S. court says judge erred in keeping Canadian cattle out No shit.
In a 56-page written opinion, the appeal court judges disputed that claim, suggesting that Cebull had been swayed by R-CALF's experts without properly considering the judgment and expertise of the USDA.Okay, you're a judge from Montana, a state that has a lot of cattle ranchers.
(
Read more... )
Comments 13
Reply
One could even question the American interests bit. Is he really protecting Americans? Or is he protecting American cattle ranchers at the expense of the rest of the population paying more for cattle prices? Which is more important in the argument of protecting "American interests?"
What happened was wrong. The USDA even recognizes that.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
But really, the cattle ban was actually good for an industry that had been complacent with getting the easy money. 20years ago when Mulroney opened up beef imports from Argentina, Australia, etc and liberalized cattle trade between the USA and Canada, a strange side effect occured. We stopped exporting and instead turned to the eliminated border. Cattle crossed the 49th sometimes 4-5 times a year in search of cheap grain, etc. Many of our facilities here closed as it was just more economical to use American ones (where wages are less then our minimum).
Something you may not have heard is that Tyson and Lakeside are about to go on strike. This, right after the border opens. Tyson is American owned. Where Lakeside is out of Quebec (I believe). http://www.vivelecanada.ca/article.php/20050714113633322
Reply
I actually did hear about the Tyson/Lakeside thing, I think on siobhan63's site.
Reply
Leave a comment