(Untitled)

Jun 04, 2004 16:43

Well well, saw the new Harry Potter last night. I wasn't planning on seeing it right at the premier actually. Being that Nancy is leaving for 2 months on Saturday and she couldn't go see it with us on Thursday at midnight, we decided to postpone the movie till Friday night ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

Comments 5

laterfader June 5 2004, 15:52:20 UTC
you thought it was the weakest of the three? oh man it was the best! The other two were cheesy and seemed like it was geared more for little kids. I think the acting was better in this one too...Harry actually got angry. oh you russians! ;)

Reply

pollitra June 5 2004, 22:12:08 UTC
but the action man, the Action!! There Was none! Well, maybe it's because the book was actually more about the explanation of the whole theme, and was geared more towards the knowledge than the adventure.

I still don't think it was captured in the movie.

By the way, a little bird told me they're planning on using Anthony Hopkins as a voice of Voldemort...

boy oh boy would that be grrrrreat!!

Reply


soy_existencia June 6 2004, 06:22:17 UTC
pollitra,

twas very kind of you to endure HP3 2wice for
your friends, especially considering your wonderfully
negative (yet aptly explained) review on the "big production".
It is very refreshing to finally hear a bit of negativity
regarding the whole thing.
Rock on Russian!

Cliff

Reply

pollitra June 6 2004, 19:44:47 UTC
WOW! I'm adding you maaaaaaan. Now I have all three of you Musketeers. eh he he he heeeeeee

Reply


anonymous June 6 2004, 20:29:58 UTC
Damn straight man, HP3 was no fun

It felt like someone was summarizing the book to me, but going way to fast and forgetting to give me details along the way. SUCKAGE.

Visually i though it was cool, but even as an art major i know that looks arn't everything. Gimme some substance! I fear for the fourth movie...

-The Willis-

Reply


Leave a comment

Up