i nearly vomitted at his comment by some fucking scumbag that should not only be castrated for his bigotted views, but it should be done without anesthetic::
"I Fucking knew it. Gawdamn fucking FAGGOTS!
That's right. From day one I said this shit is getting too far with these fags being able to adopt. What the fuck. We wouldn't leave kids in the care of a monkey, so why a fag? What's the difference? Oh yeah, more people like monkeys than that species.
Those that defend gays are the also the ones sucking them off. You can sleep with a thousand girls, but you suck one cock and you're a faggot for life. So go ahead you fags and defend that species all you fucking want. Pansies. Fuck you."
I read that thread earlier, made me sad really, but I got to thinking. Gay couples are not going against nature, for them to do that they would have to find a way to conceive a child without a member of the opposite sex, which they can't and don't
( ... )
True true, i totally agree and i wouldn't ever want to touch the debate about whether or not two dads or two mums is better than a mum and a dad because it's so complicated and i hate to say it (in most cases) a person with healthy examples of both sex as parents usually end up more well rounded but like i said i don't really know shit so i shouldn't say that.
The problem i had was people acting as though they were inhuman and therefore didn't have any desire to have have children, also the bit about "choosing it" when my brother has told me that he knew he liked boys at about 9 years old - nothing sexual, nowhere near but he still knew. I just don't see how a 9 year old kid can plan out their life to such a point. Besides who the fucks business is it anyway? What those men did was fucked up but the only reason this story is presented this was is because the title is "gay couple abuse kids" not "two paedophiles abuse kids"
Ok so me and Mikee started discussing this last night, and I had a thought. If we take Gaia Hypothesis to be true (the theory that the earth is a single living organism that we are just part of) we know that homosexuality is a mutation, right. So what if the gay mutation is a product of nature to balance out the population.
Problem: Too many people, planets life is greatly reduced as we use more resources People are a product of reproduction If reproduction stops, populations decrease.
Comments 4
"I Fucking knew it. Gawdamn fucking FAGGOTS!
That's right. From day one I said this shit is getting too far with these fags being able to adopt. What the fuck. We wouldn't leave kids in the care of a monkey, so why a fag? What's the difference? Oh yeah, more people like monkeys than that species.
Those that defend gays are the also the ones sucking them off. You can sleep with a thousand girls, but you suck one cock and you're a faggot for life. So go ahead you fags and defend that species all you fucking want. Pansies. Fuck you."
Reply
Reply
The problem i had was people acting as though they were inhuman and therefore didn't have any desire to have have children, also the bit about "choosing it" when my brother has told me that he knew he liked boys at about 9 years old - nothing sexual, nowhere near but he still knew. I just don't see how a 9 year old kid can plan out their life to such a point. Besides who the fucks business is it anyway? What those men did was fucked up but the only reason this story is presented this was is because the title is "gay couple abuse kids" not "two paedophiles abuse kids"
Take care dude x
Reply
Problem:
Too many people, planets life is greatly reduced as we use more resources
People are a product of reproduction
If reproduction stops, populations decrease.
Solution:
Stop people reproducing as much.
IF this is true is the gay mutation Evolution?
Reply
Leave a comment