People say we have to succeed in Iraq. People hearing people say "we have to succeed" ask, "Is it possible to succeed?" It's a good question, but it's not my question. I have a question that needs to be answered before we can even begin discussing whether it is possible to succeed in Iraq
(
Read more... )
Comments 1
The two main goals were to (1) eliminate the supposed threat Iraq posed to the United States and the regional stability of the Middle-East and (2) create a democratic, preferably somewhat pro-Western Iraq that would serve as a cultural/political influence in the region. The idea that this change would bring about democracy in other parts of the Middle-East was often implied, but it was a bit too New American Century to be stated blatantly.
The fringe benefit was to bring the Iraqi people out from under the thumb of a brutal dictator.
Now, we could debate the legitimacy of these various goals with our 20/20 hindsight or rehash all the debates people had leading up to the invasion, but that wasn't your question. So, I'll stop here.
Reply
Leave a comment