(Untitled)

[pretentiousblue]

Justice has further argued that...

And who can argue with justice?

Comments

[fuxd]

"Drawing upon a structuralist vocabulary, one is tempted to compare the relation between justice and judgment to that of structure and event, in that the former is on the one hand the basis for, but on the other hand only appears through, the latter.As "langue" could not exist without "parole"--in fact, would be reduced to silence--so a judgment of silence (as deferral or denial of judgment) would leave judtice 'mute'" (Claviez, 38).

[pretentiousblue]

Well damn. This could undermine my entire argument.

[scrollwyrm]

Is not Justice blind? Hath not a Jew eyes? Then, perforce, may a Jew argue with Justice!

The rest of us can only whine about how unfair she is.