(Untitled)

Sep 10, 2010 19:35

Learned today that arrow-wounds are more likely to become infected than bullet-wounds.

Leave a comment

Comments 8

merovingian September 11 2010, 01:57:20 UTC
Secondhand, I hope.

Reply

prof_vencire September 11 2010, 02:17:41 UTC
Ha, of course. I'm too old for that. I outgrew my first hand years ago.

Reply


sterlingphoenix September 11 2010, 05:38:31 UTC
That's not super-surprising, is it?

Reply

prof_vencire September 11 2010, 05:43:48 UTC
I'd honestly never applied any mental energy to thinking about it, but there's more to it than just "bullets get sterilized by the explosion a bit" and some interesting bits about the texture of the wood.

Reply

sterlingphoenix September 11 2010, 05:55:18 UTC
My thoughts are bullets are also a lot smaller, make a lot cleaner wounds, and have a lot less organic components. And no feathers.

Reply

prof_vencire September 13 2010, 01:07:40 UTC
Basically, yeah. Also, the heat of the blast does do SOME sterilization.

Reply


cloudscudding September 11 2010, 17:41:49 UTC
Heat? Gunpowder killing germs? What is the causation?

Reply

prof_vencire September 13 2010, 01:11:47 UTC
See above: Size, organic components, texture, some sterilization from being shot (heat, etc., potentially gunpowder for older wounds as it does have some medicinal use, if I recall, but I don't know in-depth how accurate that is), surface area. All sorts of things that make a ton of what feels like really obvious sense but that I never really bothered to think about before.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up