Every four years I'm genuinely puzzled by why people vote. I can think of a dozen reasons not to vote, and none whatsoever to do so. Here are my dozen reasons not to vote:
1) I live in California, where the probability of my vote mattering is zero.
2) Even if I lived in a different state, the probability of my vote mattering is as close to zero as
(
Read more... )
Comments 64
Reply
Reply
~ For the things I _really_ care about (e.g., death penalty) I have a certain multiplier effect. I'm not out campaigning, but it does come up in conversation, and I'm sure I've swayed a few people to see things my way.
~ All in all, voting, to me, is part of what a civilized person does. I don't throw trash on the street, I donate (small amounts of) money to charities I care about, I'd clean up after my dog if I had one, and I vote :) It's a little thing, but then again all of these things are little. In aggregate they add up.
Тут стоит культурный парк по-над речкою,
Тут гуляю и плюю только в урны я :)
or something.
Reply
Reply
I guess my vote is more important than your vote! Because it counts! :)
Of course, if it was only presidential elections, I would not vote. We have not had a single presidential ad here in MA (xlyup-xlyup, they don't love us!). However, we have a number of interesting ballot questions this year, and a close senatorial race.
Reply
"Interesting ballot questions" - sure. I find elections interesting, that's true. I follow them more than the vast majority of people who vote, I'm sure. It's just that i don't see a reason to vote just because I find them interesting :)
Reply
На эту тему: мне как-то старенькая англичанка сказала - давно, когда я жила в России и объясняла ей, что не голосую, потому что не хочу участвовать в спектакле с их методами подсчета:
- Наши бабушки так долго боролись за право голосовать, что я просто им должна этим правом пользоваться.
Как ты понимаешь, и в ее, и в моем случае - выбор личный (как любой экзистенциальный выбор...читайте Сартра) - а значит ни в коем случае не означающий попытку навязать его другим.
Reply
Важно не то, повлияет ли с точки зрения статистики, а то, что лично с твоей точки зрения ты сделал все от тебя зависящее, даже если это ни на что не повлияло
См. пункт 12. Если мы действительно про "сделал все, от тебя зависящее", то явно сделать можно сильно больше, чем проголосовать
Наши бабушки так долго боролись за право голосовать, что я просто им должна этим правом пользоваться.
Тоже не очень очевидно, почему. Совсем глупый пример: бабушки в разных странах боролись за право делать аборты, и это очень важное право. Но никто же не станет призывать женщин пользоваться этим правом только по этой причине?
Наверное я, как либертарианец, хоть и умеренный, отношусь ко всему, связанному с госудраством, как к абортам - safe, legal, and rare :)
Reply
Но в принципе да, голосование на президентских выборах превратилось из "голосую за этого кандидата, т.к. он мне нравится" в "голосую за меньшее зло из двух". Но я вообше глубоко убеждена, что у центристов (к коим я себя отношу) выбора вообше практически нет и ни одного из кандидатов не интересует наше мнение.
Reply
Re local elections, and especially "direct democracy": not that I know anything about anything, but I've heard that usually the issues on the ballot are much clearer -- i.e., you would have an opinion, and probably a strong one. (but sure, on CA-wide ballot one vote won't count much.)
Reply
The issues on the ballot in local elections are ANYTHING BUT clear. I encourage you to read through propositions on this year's ballot, and tell me how a bunch of folks can make any sense out of them whatsoever. If ever the law of unintended consequences needed a poster child, "direct democracy" would be it.
Reply
(What it means for democracy to work -- I have no idea. Yes, speaking in ill-defined terms, for the lack of better-defined terms. One reason I prefer to do math.)
Re local elections: I said "issues", not "wordings". Indeed, "direct democracy" is ridiculous. Presumably because many, if not most, propositions are ridiculous if you think carefully. But then, like I said, the issue is clear.
Reply
I blew a couple of chances to vote for another country, but this was sheer laziness (in the face of some non-trivial logistical difficulties). I think I voted once, and then the issue was very clear and dear to me.
Reply
Voting for third-party candidates is important - it's the best way to let the small party or the independent person on the ballot know s/he matters. I think a multi-party system is a good thing, and the only way to ever get there is to vote for someone other than a Democrat or Republican nominee - because there is not enough people voting for them, and every vote counts.
Reply
What's so great about this? The election is decided by the uninformed masses. Why do you feel like you want your informed vote to be drowned by them?
Voting for third-party candidates is important - it's the best way to let the small party or the independent person on the ballot know s/he matters.
So far we collectively show them that they do not matter - they hardly ever get any meaningful votes. Again, the issue with 3rd party candidates is 1) There is nobody I like, either 2) They are completely unelectable. I can as well "Like" their Facebook page - it'll have the same effect :)
Reply
Uninformed masses vote more or less randomly, and the election is decided by a small portion of votes cast by those who care. I think I read about this in "The Myth of the Rational Voter: Why Democracies Choose Bad Policies" by Bryan Douglas Caplan.
> I can as well "Like" their Facebook page - it'll have the same effect
You can "Like" as many parties as there are, but you've only got one vote - and giving that in support of a small outfit is very meaningful to both the party you're voting for, and the candidates who do not get your vote. By all means, vote for a candidate or a party you like, or at least can stomach - they need the support and encouragement, especially if they're not going to win. "Like" on their FB page is OK too.
Reply
Leave a comment