addendum to other entry today

Jun 24, 2005 18:33

In other news ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

Comments 5

shinsuinoseito June 25 2005, 03:57:32 UTC
I can't believe the government can take people's property and give it to private developers. This isn't something the government should be doing at all and goes far beyond the already uneasy acceptance of Eminent Domain. At least in that situation the government is taking it, not giving to some private contractor for development.

Don't think liberals are cheering this on. The NY Times doesn't represent everyone. Most good liberals would argue that this is a flagrant overextension of government power, especially when pointed out that the government is giving land to private organizations.

Reply


dallaspaz June 25 2005, 04:07:18 UTC
Hear Hear, that's shitty.

Reply


amoralphreak June 25 2005, 04:45:33 UTC
hah, your rants make me happy.

and how is it that you get the post-freshmen-at-home 15? ^_~ weirdo

Reply


bddwyer June 25 2005, 05:26:45 UTC
I'm not particularly pleased.

Lauren doesn't have internet to post this where she is, but she's fucking pissed. Like, she wants to protest.

Locke is rolling over in his grave.

Reply


oneholyfool June 25 2005, 08:43:03 UTC
Majority:
Stevens
Souter
Kennedy
Breyer
Ginsberg

Minority:
O'Connor
Rhenquist
Scalia
Thomas

I agree with the ruling fully. The majority opinion emphasizes that it has to be part of a comprehensive economic development plan and the owners have to recieve just compensation. I think the public interest overruled the absolutist interpretation of property rights. This is on about the same level as taxation in terms of property rights.

As to the Iliad, read the Lattimore translation. It's what we use at Reed, and I know a few folks who have read both and conclude the Lattimore is much better.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up