There's no business like
For those of you who don't have a NYT subscription:
Found at NYT
By JUAN FORERO
Published: May 12, 2006
BOGOTÁ, Colombia, May 11 - Colombia's highest court has legalized abortion under limited circumstances. The decision is expected to embolden women's rights groups across Latin America to use courts in their countries to try to roll back some of the world's most stringent abortion laws.
In a 5-to-3 decision handed down late Wednesday, the Constitutional Court overturned Colombia's complete ban on abortion and ruled that the procedure would be permitted when the life of a mother was in danger or the fetus was expected to die or in cases of rape or incest. Women's rights organizations in places as varied as Argentina and New York hailed the ruling.
"This is a triumph for Colombian and Latin American women," said Mónica Roa, a lawyer in Bogotá who brought the suit on the grounds that by banning abortion, Colombia was violating its own commitments to international human rights treaties ensuring a woman's right to life and health.
The court, explaining its decision Thursday night, said the life of a fetus could not be put ahead of the life of a mother and called the complete abortion ban "disproportionate" and "irrational."
Advocates of abortion rights say both arguments are applicable to other Latin American countries as well.
Ms. Roa's suit was backed financially by Women's Link Worldwide, a Madrid-based group for which she works.
But opponents in this heavily Roman Catholic region saw the decision as akin to legalizing murder. Cardinal Alfonso López Trujillo, Colombia's highest Catholic Church official, told RCN radio here that the decision was "an attack on human life."
"The depenalization of abortion is a judicial stupidity," Cardinal Trujillo said. "The Constitutional Court does not have the right to say there is or there is not a crime. This is a bad decision, the fruit of international pressures that disrespect many Colombians."
Colombia's conservative government, led by President Álvaro Uribe, has strongly supported the Catholic Church's position on abortion.
Women's rights groups and human rights organizations have been mounting challenges in Latin America in courts and on the streets to laws that in most cases permit abortion only when a woman has been raped or her life is in danger, according to the Center for Reproductive Rights, in New York. Abortion has been banned in Chile and El Salvador. In the region, it is readily available only in Cuba and a few English-speaking Caribbean nations.
The parliaments of some countries, like Argentina and Uruguay, have begun to debate proposals to loosen abortion laws. In two recent cases, international human rights commissions told Peru and Mexico that they had violated their own laws by not permitting two women - in Mexico, a rape victim, and in Peru, a teenager whose fetus was severely malformed - to receive abortions.
With Colombia's decision, several groups across Latin America that have been pressing for looser abortion laws see new opportunities to use the courts, many of which are changing and are seen as becoming more independent.
"This decision influences and makes one think that other countries will advance on this issue," Susana Chávez, director of the Center for the Promotion of Sexual and Reproductive Rights in Peru.
In Buenos Aires, Mabel Bianco, president of the Foundation for Studies and Research on Women, said the Colombia decision could propel plaintiffs to demand that governments adhere to the international treaties they signed requiring that they ensure a woman's right to health care.
"I think this decision will prompt countries in Latin America that have stringent legislation to reflect that abortion is not ideological, but a health care issue," Ms. Bianco said.
Groups advocating changing the laws argue that the abortion laws in Latin America are counterproductive. Latin America has a higher rate of abortion than even in Western European countries where abortion is legal and widely available.
Four million abortions, most of them illegal, take place in Latin America annually, the United Nations reports, and up to 5,000 women are believed to die each year from complications that arise from the procedure. At least 300,000 illegal abortions are believed to take place in Colombia each year.
The court's ruling will not be easy to put into effect, as health authorities ponder such thorny issues as how to confirm that a woman seeking an abortion was raped.
The Catholic Church hierarchy and some groups opposed to abortion vowed to fight on.
"We are calling for civil disobedience, so Colombians do not follow these practices," said José Galat, the rector of the Gran Colombia University. He has paid for full-page newspaper advertisements criticizing abortion rights advocates. "We're going to call for a referendum to let the people decide if abortion should be legal or not because the court cannot impose this."
Monica Trujillo contributed reporting for this article.
I wish I could at least say that much for our country-- I'm on day to day as to whether or not I can actually do anything to my own body.
I'm still waiting for the government approve my petition for a nose stud.
Or a tattoo, they're having major issues with that one.
Found at NYT
By JUAN FORERO
Published: May 12, 2006
BOGOTÁ, Colombia, May 11 - Colombia's highest court has legalized abortion under limited circumstances. The decision is expected to embolden women's rights groups across Latin America to use courts in their countries to try to roll back some of the world's most stringent abortion laws.
In a 5-to-3 decision handed down late Wednesday, the Constitutional Court overturned Colombia's complete ban on abortion and ruled that the procedure would be permitted when the life of a mother was in danger or the fetus was expected to die or in cases of rape or incest. Women's rights organizations in places as varied as Argentina and New York hailed the ruling.
"This is a triumph for Colombian and Latin American women," said Mónica Roa, a lawyer in Bogotá who brought the suit on the grounds that by banning abortion, Colombia was violating its own commitments to international human rights treaties ensuring a woman's right to life and health.
The court, explaining its decision Thursday night, said the life of a fetus could not be put ahead of the life of a mother and called the complete abortion ban "disproportionate" and "irrational."
Advocates of abortion rights say both arguments are applicable to other Latin American countries as well.
Ms. Roa's suit was backed financially by Women's Link Worldwide, a Madrid-based group for which she works.
But opponents in this heavily Roman Catholic region saw the decision as akin to legalizing murder. Cardinal Alfonso López Trujillo, Colombia's highest Catholic Church official, told RCN radio here that the decision was "an attack on human life."
"The depenalization of abortion is a judicial stupidity," Cardinal Trujillo said. "The Constitutional Court does not have the right to say there is or there is not a crime. This is a bad decision, the fruit of international pressures that disrespect many Colombians."
Colombia's conservative government, led by President Álvaro Uribe, has strongly supported the Catholic Church's position on abortion.
Women's rights groups and human rights organizations have been mounting challenges in Latin America in courts and on the streets to laws that in most cases permit abortion only when a woman has been raped or her life is in danger, according to the Center for Reproductive Rights, in New York. Abortion has been banned in Chile and El Salvador. In the region, it is readily available only in Cuba and a few English-speaking Caribbean nations.
The parliaments of some countries, like Argentina and Uruguay, have begun to debate proposals to loosen abortion laws. In two recent cases, international human rights commissions told Peru and Mexico that they had violated their own laws by not permitting two women - in Mexico, a rape victim, and in Peru, a teenager whose fetus was severely malformed - to receive abortions.
With Colombia's decision, several groups across Latin America that have been pressing for looser abortion laws see new opportunities to use the courts, many of which are changing and are seen as becoming more independent.
"This decision influences and makes one think that other countries will advance on this issue," Susana Chávez, director of the Center for the Promotion of Sexual and Reproductive Rights in Peru.
In Buenos Aires, Mabel Bianco, president of the Foundation for Studies and Research on Women, said the Colombia decision could propel plaintiffs to demand that governments adhere to the international treaties they signed requiring that they ensure a woman's right to health care.
"I think this decision will prompt countries in Latin America that have stringent legislation to reflect that abortion is not ideological, but a health care issue," Ms. Bianco said.
Groups advocating changing the laws argue that the abortion laws in Latin America are counterproductive. Latin America has a higher rate of abortion than even in Western European countries where abortion is legal and widely available.
Four million abortions, most of them illegal, take place in Latin America annually, the United Nations reports, and up to 5,000 women are believed to die each year from complications that arise from the procedure. At least 300,000 illegal abortions are believed to take place in Colombia each year.
The court's ruling will not be easy to put into effect, as health authorities ponder such thorny issues as how to confirm that a woman seeking an abortion was raped.
The Catholic Church hierarchy and some groups opposed to abortion vowed to fight on.
"We are calling for civil disobedience, so Colombians do not follow these practices," said José Galat, the rector of the Gran Colombia University. He has paid for full-page newspaper advertisements criticizing abortion rights advocates. "We're going to call for a referendum to let the people decide if abortion should be legal or not because the court cannot impose this."
Monica Trujillo contributed reporting for this article.
I wish I could at least say that much for our country-- I'm on day to day as to whether or not I can actually do anything to my own body.
I'm still waiting for the government approve my petition for a nose stud.
Or a tattoo, they're having major issues with that one.