How scientific am I? Obsessively so.

[purpleicicles]

In the interest of the scientific method, I've added to my interests on my profile page to keep up with how much I have changed since I set up this account about a year ago. The results are, to say the least, very interesting...

So, purpleicicles, your LiveJournal reveals...

Comments

[xcerpted]

*laughs* My profile/interests/etc. is SO very unupdated/messy/etc. if the test judges by it, then I think I've got an inaccurate score. Hmm...

[purpleicicles]

It's probably all horribly inaccurate, yet strangely fun and quite obsessive...

[gen50]

i applaud your scientific inquiry.
i was going to do that too, but i was too tired
and well, it was much more productive to read more manga (you agree?)
and then well, am trying not to stay up too late....
and get more rest.

i wonder how they derived keen to please - based on the number of .... communities, do you think... or the number of non-mutual friends?(hmmmm)

maybe the popular has something to do with mutual friends, or the number of comments one gets....(but if your post is locked, how would they know? ah... perhaps the counter for the messages - since lj keeps track of it, there must be a profile system value)

and writing style? duh. i happen to like eecummings - and that's not a conventional style AT all. ah well ....

[purpleicicles]

I'm sorely tempted to design my own one now, but I have a million other things that need doing... Keen to please puzzled me too - I wonder if they base it on use of emoticons and such, because that would explain a lot!! ^___^ I think you're probably right for the popularity score, but the writing style is a tough one, largely because how on earth would you evaluate something like that?!?

t was much more productive to read more manga (you agree?)

Oh yes, definitely!