Leave a comment

Comments 4

trochee June 28 2009, 21:17:36 UTC
hah. i wonder if 'brace' is undergoing the slow creep of "couple" -- I have even caught myself saying "give it a couple of whacks" and meaning "some small plural number" -- three would certainly have been acceptable for me.

more likely this is the semantic equivalent of the over-read but under-verbalized people who don't know how to pronounce (e.g.) 'syncope'.

Reply

q_pheevr June 28 2009, 21:34:26 UTC

The thing about couple, though, is that the extended sense of the word includes the traditional sense-"a couple," in the informal sense of the word, means something like 'approximately two' (definitely more than one, but probably not much more than three). Martin's definition of brace, on the other hand, explicitly excludes the canonical meaning of the word; he's actually contrasting "a brace" with "two" here.

I like the analogy with the pronunciation of syncope; it looks to me as if Martin has simply taken brace to be one of those vague collective nouns like clutch or passel-which is, after all, a more likely-sounding meaning than 'pair,' in the same way that syncope looks rather as if it ought to have two syllables rather than three.

Reply


ext_58919 June 29 2009, 06:58:57 UTC
This is definitely the first time I've ever heard of "brace" having a numerical meaning, whether two, four, or eight hundred and nineteen. I hope that you never need to brace yourself for the disappointment of not winning more than four awards.

Reply


theridger July 6 2009, 21:30:08 UTC
Fortunately he defined "brace" for us, since otherwise we'd just be thinking he was crazy. "Two is pity but a brace? Wow!" Odd.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up