I read
these posts by Elizabeth Moon and Cat Valente, respectively. (Short version: Moon wrote a long, fail-y rant about how being a good citizen, as an immigrant, means putting up with ignorant racist bullshit and cutting white folks some slack. Valente more or less said "Bullshit. I am very disappointed in you.") It got me thinking about
(
Read more... )
Comments 19
Two example links: The dos and don’ts of defending Muslim women and Racism, feminism, and the issue of FGE.
Reply
Reply
Reply
This also applies if a person wants to veil and is being prevented from doing so (you might consider the situation in France). Veiling is often presenting in the west as being exactly equal to oppressing women. But the reality is a lot more complex, and in western societies the latter is at least as likely as the former.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
You're asking me all the same questions again. If you don't like the answer -- or disagree, or whatever -- just say that.
I can't point to a line, because I would first have to invent an hypothetical case, and then state an hypothetical 'you' opinion, and then point where that 'you' went over the line. It just doesn't work that way.
I will repeat my general answer: if you burningly want to do social justice activism outside your own culture, get ready to be wrong, and get ready to listen first to the people in that culture and society.
(Also, I'm the daughter of two anthropologists -- probably my 'objective' morality will sound like cowardly moral relativism to you. This is a separate and probably not productive discussion.)
Reply
I'm think I'm reaching for more specific parameters for my behavior, a framework to base my choices around. Activist etiquette, maybe?
With respect to "objectively harmful" (and if you don't want to talk about it, I understand and respect that, I'm just throwing this out for anyone who wants to weigh in) perhaps a good starting point is "physical damage beyond cosmetic"? Or, maybe, "creates long-term, untenable psychological damage?" With the first I'm thinking of, say, the physical damage caused by female genital mutilation (or male circumcision), with the second, the psychological damage of a forced marriage (as opposed to an arranged marriage, which isn't necessarily unconsented.)
Reply
*high-fives you through the internet*
Reply
I'm really glad this forum is here, and I can feel comfortable posting this.
Reply
That's not really accurate... In fact, quite a lot of what Moon writes (the generic "good citizenship means giving back" stuff) is admirable... She just FAILs totally when she gets to the last part of the essay, mis-applying the general thoughts on Good Citizens and going off about the Cordoba Center (better known as the -- mis-named -- "Ground Zero Mosque", which is NOT a Mosque -- nor a "memorial", as Moon calls it -- nor located at "Ground Zero").
I wish the teabaggers and corporatist pseudo-"libertarians" would take to heart the parts about how what's good for business is NOT necessarily good for the country, for instance...
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment