Space Elevator

Mar 31, 2008 00:29

According to physicist Bradley Edward, it costs about $10,000 per lb to launch something into space, but a working space elevator would lower the cost to about $100 per lb.

space, tech

Leave a comment

Comments 4

wesleydodds March 31 2008, 04:49:03 UTC
The problem is that we don't have any material that is strong but light enough for the cable. Scientists are working on it but there's still a long way to go.

Another option is a mass driver, basically a giant rail gun.

Reply

ragnarok_2012 March 31 2008, 04:57:01 UTC
I'm optimistic about carbon nanotubes.

Not optimistic about funding, though. I think that's the bottleneck right now.

Reply

wesleydodds March 31 2008, 05:01:38 UTC
Carbon nanotubes would have a lot of other applications, too, so it's definitely worth researching. Even if they never reach the limits they would need for a space elevator there would still be lots of uses for them.

Reply

roadriverrail March 31 2008, 15:16:51 UTC
I'm only mildly optimistic about them as a material choice for a space elevator. Like wesleydodds mentions, they're useful in other contexts, but a space elevator still pushes their theoretical limits too hard for me to consider them a good choice.

I'm not saying it can't be done with carbon nanotubes. I'm just not overly optimistic.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up