Leave a comment

Comments 3

cranky__crocus March 1 2012, 16:08:38 UTC
"Like."

*Adds thumbs-up for good measure.*

Reply

rainydaymare March 2 2012, 15:43:20 UTC
LOL, glad you approve. :3

Is it wrong that I aspire to being man-fabulous because being lady-fabulous takes waaaaaaaaay too much effort?

Reply

cranky__crocus March 4 2012, 05:38:07 UTC
Not at all. :B Least, not by my way of thinking.

I only get by with lady-fabulous from time to time by going more old-fashioned, 'cause it seems to take less accessories/time than present-day lady fabulous: long hair down or done up quickly (bun with chopstick/pen/whatever); leggings; top-tucked-into-skirt-at-waist; boots. I go nakey-face most of the time, very occasionally mascara and eyeliner if I want to be like "LOOKIE ME I HAVE EYES!"

Most of the time, I'm at home in jammies. Sometimes it's jeans-and-tee to go out. Other times it's "lulz I'm going to layer on random shite and look like a quirky pixie dryad chicka", which I do rather well, but is not lady-fabulous. It is lady-funkiness.

And I am unfortunately not Stephen Fry. D:

I wish I could be man-fabulous. My bewbs are super annoying for that. *Shakes fist.* But seriously, they make me super fun to cuddle with, no lie.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up