(Untitled)

[ranas_amo]

Buck was right, there is a disclaimer thingy at the bottom of my last entry. But...I found another website that has the EXACT (I can not emphasize enough how alike they are) same results. Do you think this one is a copy-cat, or do you think the whole thing is true?http://chrisevans3d.

Comments

[i_love_harry85]

i saw that already!! sure ts true bush is a retard

[mr_buck]

lol, you never read the bottom of the web sites, they always have disclaimers, like this one had:
"As a regular reader of the "Economist" I can confirm that this table (for the 2000 election) was indeed published in the 'Economist". However, a few issues later on, the 'Economist' published a retraction, saying the data was unable to be verified and possibly a hoax."
so yeah, it's probably not true, but it could somewhat be true cause it seems kinda right. plus who knows, the pecents of who voted for who could be close so there would still be a lot of dumb kerry people and maybe 49% of them are super dumb kerry people and 51% slightly smart bush people, so it averages out to be dumb bush people.

[ranas_amo]

I saw it, I just didn't feel like reading it 0:)

[i_love_harry85]

yes dumb bush people