While I'm not one of the people that believes the hoax, your arrogance on this matter is rather startling. True, the paper may bear some useful, mythbusting facts, but there's a good chance that the author may have creatively embellished the scientific details of the facts behind the matter. How much do you know about photography and how light exposes on film? How much do you know about thermal radiation, or the physics required to verify these claims?
I find this paper to be interesting, but I would not claim it to be factual until I can verify a good chunk of this author's statements.
Comments 2
I find this paper to be interesting, but I would not claim it to be factual until I can verify a good chunk of this author's statements.
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment