Well...I am intrigued by the books now. But the whole "zomg, its against the CHURCH, kill eeeeeet" thing...what is with that? Because of that crap, the whole of Gat's side of the family got warned off going to see it.
Why, oh why, can't people just appreciate movie's - and books - as they are and not find the meaning in them or whatever then blow the whole shebang out of proportion? DX
Oh, read the books. They're so good. And the books are very much against organized religion, but they're utterly, utterly for personal spirituality. The Archbishop of Canterbury is actually a big advocate of Christians reading these books to reaffirm their personal relationships with the divine -- the books make you question the benefit of taking orders, of believing what people tell you to believe, but they also make you understand what is really valuable. The obvious things that people somehow miss -- love, hope, perseverance, growing into yourself
( ... )
We were really shocked and puzzled by the way they ditched the ending too - WTF? The film just sort of drifts off into a bland nothingness with no real 'Wow.' A film like that needs a big wow ending that leaves people desperate to see the sequels, and it was left to fizzle out
( ... )
I don't really see how the ending of Golden Compass (the book) is any different from the ending of the first LotR movie. You could transpose Sam & Frodo's dialogue onto Lyra and Pan as they walk onto the bridge of light, and almost have the exact same ending. And it's not as if the Rings movies did poorly. Granted, I know that because the Compass people aren't filming all three at once, it's different... the next one depends on if this one succeeds or not, etc etc. But I just think they aren't trusting their audience enough. And since it's a big epic that I'm emotionally attached to in the first place... I find it hard to like the movie if I feel like the people who made it didn't trust me
( ... )
WTF Revisitedmark_mimiDecember 11 2007, 04:58:58 UTC
Okay, first just let me say that the idea of Iorek as a peppermint flavored candy had me rolling. And as we are on Iorek, I shall start here. To quote my fab manager at the movies "WTF!?! did that bear seriously just rip off the other one's jaw and eat his throat?" At which point I leaned over and said, "Yes. But at least they cut the part where he eats the heart." Seriously, though Pullman's inclusion of graphic violence, painted in a heroic light has troubled me for some time and it was no different with the movie
( ... )
Re: WTF Revisitedravenclaw42December 11 2007, 08:22:45 UTC
Mmm, you know how our opinions differ. Truce. ^_^.
Graphic violence: I always read these books as a sort of intentional inverse of the perfect children's fairytale. So I never thought Pullman painted violence in a heroic light. Because Lyra likes the violence, and she isn't painted in a heroic light -- she is, in his own words, unimaginative and manipulative. I liked the violence of Iorek because it showed how alien he was, not because it was supposed to be desirable
( ... )
Re: WTF Revisitedmark_mimiDecember 11 2007, 20:34:33 UTC
Ha...who would have thought that I'd prefer a happy ending and you the bittersweet...I am such a sad little sappy fangirl. You know we will never agree on anything and that is what is very cool about us.
As to your soapbox, rant on my friend. I totally agree with the age-marketing thing. I run into the same problem with YA books. Gossip Girl anyone?
Lastly, *yay* thanks very much in advance for the Christmas present. I'm so excited to see it!
Re: WTF Revisitedravenclaw42December 12 2007, 01:48:11 UTC
It's a different present than the one I told you, so it'll be a surprise. :D It's soooo much fun. I'm gonna make one for myself, but slightly different. Hah, have fun trying to figure that one out. *lips sealed*
Comments 9
Why, oh why, can't people just appreciate movie's - and books - as they are and not find the meaning in them or whatever then blow the whole shebang out of proportion? DX
And that is uuber suckage on the ending.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Graphic violence: I always read these books as a sort of intentional inverse of the perfect children's fairytale. So I never thought Pullman painted violence in a heroic light. Because Lyra likes the violence, and she isn't painted in a heroic light -- she is, in his own words, unimaginative and manipulative. I liked the violence of Iorek because it showed how alien he was, not because it was supposed to be desirable ( ... )
Reply
As to your soapbox, rant on my friend. I totally agree with the age-marketing thing. I run into the same problem with YA books. Gossip Girl anyone?
Lastly, *yay* thanks very much in advance for the Christmas present. I'm so excited to see it!
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment