Frankly, My Dear

Apr 18, 2005 16:17


Read more... )

Leave a comment

Comments 31

drsmax April 18 2005, 13:22:26 UTC
Wow!

Cool alt title, too.

Reply

raygunn_revival April 18 2005, 13:28:34 UTC
Yay!

Double yay!

I've been going through some old Henri Cartier Bresson books and realizing that I am so inspired by his work and I want to explore more in the artistic photojournalism area. Less creepy nightmarish stuff, I think, will be the order of the day.

But to those who enjoy the horrorshow, I'll try to keep a (severed) hand in. I wouldn't want to alienate anyone.

Reply

moosemonster April 18 2005, 13:58:01 UTC
Can you combine them?

Lovely photo.

Reply

raygunn_revival April 18 2005, 14:00:17 UTC
Two great tastes that taste great together, eh?

I'll see what I can do!

And thanks.

Reply


spasmsproject April 18 2005, 13:41:21 UTC
I dunno, I think I'd like it better if I saw it sans the actors in the reflection. But I've never seen "Gone With the Wind," so maybe there's a reference I'm missing?

Reply

raygunn_revival April 18 2005, 13:54:50 UTC
Hey! Thanks for the crit :)

You're not missing much of a reference beyond what's there, though.

For my own part, I was entranced by the juxtaposition I saw between reckless youth and fiery passion, as emblematized by that scene in GWTW, with the dottering camaraderie of the elderly couple.

I'm not sure if I'd like the picture without Viv and Clark.

Reply

spasmsproject April 18 2005, 14:10:38 UTC
I always figured Rhett and Scarlett wouldn't last. I'd rather have what the old people have.

My father's parents are in their late 80s. They still hold hands. That's what I want.

Reply

raygunn_revival April 18 2005, 15:28:29 UTC
I wholeheartedly second that.

I want what my grandparents had too.

But I refuse to believe they weren't passionate about each other when they were young.

Reply


Further Proof Colleen is NOT a romantic... colleenaf April 18 2005, 13:47:18 UTC
My first thought was "HA! He's pulling his own finger."

Leave it up to me to take a beautiful photograph and make it all about gas.

Reply

Re: Further Proof Colleen is NOT a romantic... raygunn_revival April 18 2005, 13:57:23 UTC
Ha!

I don't make passes at folks who pass gasses.

Eh. Farts are a part of life. Especially at that stage. I bet they love each other toots an' all.

Reply

While we're in the gutter moosemonster April 18 2005, 13:59:52 UTC
I'm not entirely certain he's wearing anything under that overcoat, or that he knows the woman, or that she minds.

Reply

Re: While we're in the gutter raygunn_revival April 18 2005, 15:25:00 UTC
You'll be gratified to hear that he was wearing a Batman-esque fake six-pack chest underneath that overcoat.

And that the woman was his sister, and had seen it all before.

And that I'm full of hooey.

Reply


slinka April 18 2005, 13:58:36 UTC
I love how the couples are in diagonal corners from each other. It's technically and sentimentally beautiful.

Reply

raygunn_revival April 18 2005, 15:23:09 UTC
Thanks, angelpants.

I've had various and sundry adversarial run-ins with sentimentality. I think we're going to be on better terms in the future. I appreciate the encouragement!

Reply

slinka April 18 2005, 15:45:36 UTC
I've never been called angelpants before! :D

Reply


Is My Age Showing? auggiewren April 18 2005, 19:02:39 UTC
The reflection over the poster strikes me in the same way a picture fades on an old television. It was hard to comprehend that these people could be the children of Gable.That would place them at my parents' age. "IMPOSSIBLE!" says I. In my mind's eye (or eye's mind...), they are contemporaries of the pictured picture stars.

Reply

Re: Is My Age Showing? raygunn_revival April 19 2005, 03:48:02 UTC
My general policy is not to undercut anyone's interpretation of my work, but here is the straight dope on the age question:

William Clark Gable was born in 1901.

The elderly couple I had guessed to be in their mid- to late seventies.

Therefore, it's possible that they could have been the children of Gable, but unlikely that they could have been contemporaries. That would make them 104.

However, neither child-of-ness nor contemporary-ness were themes I had intended or even conceived of when I shot this picture.

Reply

auggiewren April 19 2005, 04:04:45 UTC
I understand all you've said. For me, approaching the legendary "hill"*, it is just amazing that I've seen the young turn into the elderly.

Reply

raygunn_revival April 19 2005, 04:11:19 UTC


What, Blueberry Hill?

Seriously: very well said. For what it's worth, it doesn't show.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up