Endure all the suffering the world has to offer but willingly accept the necessity of it. I don't know much about Buddhism, but that is a really good summary of Christ.
Indeed. I think the dichotomy is quite honest and seeking both leads to clarity. I think he's on the right path.
My real problem with religions is with the faith and supernatural aspects. The language seems to muddy and blend together things that are different, which if done on purpose is deceptive. It's too easy for people to get lost in believing they're "right" instead of seeking honesty and clarity.
A certain amount of boosterism is inherent in all of humanity. Everyone wants to be proud of who and what they are, and as such people will believe in the "rightness" of everything they do. People will support anything because it's their "team" - something that was part of their family, their community, their culture
( ... )
Well put. I agree that cultures can be a repository of wisdom that's beyond what a single individual can do. I'm advocating for calling it what it is though. Cultural wisdom is cultural wisdom, not objective truth. The dogma aspect of religions isn't cultural wisdom, it's trying to be something that it's not. It's not objective fact (like saying Adam and Eve are the birth of all humanity instead of evolution, they weren't). But that same honesty applies to science as well. Science studies what is. It can't comment at all on what ought to be, what's good, what's moral, what's beautiful. In that way science can also be dogmatic, if it tries to be something that it's not.
Click to view
Comments 8
Reply
My real problem with religions is with the faith and supernatural aspects. The language seems to muddy and blend together things that are different, which if done on purpose is deceptive. It's too easy for people to get lost in believing they're "right" instead of seeking honesty and clarity.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment