That's what I call quality nitpicking

[rbfvid]

So, there is this thread on /r/badhistory, and it's absolutely priceless: To everyone's surprise, "Buffy the Vampire Slayer" is not always the most accurate source of history.
And it's not exactly what you expect from the title. It's better.

Comments

[feliciacraft]

Lol!

First, if I can stop chuckling to--no, I can't.

Second, I'd like the author of this piece as my Beta! That's just precious.

Thanks for sharing!

[rbfvid]

Yesh, this guy would make a great beta)

[kerkevik_2014]

Personally I'd go for them on the fact that they think that creatures without a way of pumping blood could get an erection.

The potential for headlines about rampant increases in lesbian vampires will send the economy through the roof.

And we can sit back with a bottle of Thomas the Aquaman, or... was it Jack Frost?

Well at least my moustache is real, if untidy.

And I shall now return to posting a new story...

I blame Barry Osama!

kerk

[rbfvid]

Nah, going for then because of erection is boring (and done like bazillion times already). Going for them because the wetaher in historical flashback is wrong - that's priceless!

[kerkevik_2014]

Yeah well,

might be boring for you, but how vampires manage it is more relevant to me at my stage of life...

This kind of thing is why I never try to write sex scenes, since most of my 'ships are f/f.

Go check out my new fic; there#s links and everything :-)

kerk

[rbfvid]

=)

[tei_lj]

Wow, that's dedication! I like it :D

[rbfvid]

If only they had a guy like that as a series consultant... =)