Hmmm...Some clarification.
Metrosexuals DO NOT EXIST. Guys who look good and take care of themselves do not need a special name. I dont get what is so special about that. I'snt that what you are supposed to do anyway? i can sure as hell bet that if a guy wasn't in some form or fashon a "metrosexual", he would definetly get a special name: "Eww!"
(
Read more... )
Comments 67
Reply
So why should it be
You and I should get along
So aw-full-ly. . .
Sorry. Had a Depeche moment.
I don't think metro was ever meant to be insulting; its exigesis was during the Howard Dean campaign, and it highlighted the desire of urban young men to be well-groomed. And, yes, stereotyping of any ilk is wrong, wrong, wrong, but these are terms that only have power if they are GIVEN negative energy. So. . .my theory is this. . .a person's saexual identity is inextricably linked with his or her persona, and whatever terminology he or she claims is valid from his or her perspective. Not trying to engage in a debate on moral relativism, but I think that we tend to classify and objectify enough as a culture. I'd love to see an end to the inter-group squabbling over labels and categories.
Have a nice day! Thanks for your help this afternoon!!!!!!
Reply
Reply
Reply
As a verb.
Reply
Marcus, you are Audrey II.
Reply
Reply
er... nevermind.
<3
Reply
That sounds good to me.
Reply
Leave a comment