There is no difference between the policies of Clinton and Bush, nor are there between Bush and Obama's. The two parties are simply speaking two corporations looking out for the interests of their investors with puppets spouting rhetoric to garner support from an ignorant public that never seems to realize that neither party supports the ideals
(
Read more... )
Comments 9
(The comment has been removed)
My point is clear. I can point out multiple instances of him voting against our interests. Where are your specific examples? Or is it all just hope?
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Reply
But you and I both know I'm whistling past the cemetery. The MSM would NEVER have endorsed anyone who wasn't a bona fide member of the pod people: they may look liberal, and they may talk liberal, but under all the layers of play-acting they're part of the fascist machine and they're going to make us all very, very sorry.
...Okay: sorrier.
Reply
It was an appropriate analogy as well seeing as I think the chances of Obama turning out to be a progressive leader representing real change are about as good as the chances that he'll suddenly develop heat vision and super strength.
Reply
( ... )
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment