So I am cutting this post because I know there are some among my general acquaintance who love Wicked - and I speak in absolute ignorance about the play having never seen it but - I am going to speak rather candidly about the book and others might disagree. And given how vehemently I refuse to even discuss the existence of that abomination 'Pride
(
Read more... )
Comments 12
I'm in the same boat as you: I'm a big fan of the musical, but really couldn't plough through the book.
I think that each uses the strengths of its medium. A book can spend as much time, space, and ink as it likes on technical considerations, and Maguire builds a lot of arguments about political and social systems as his novel progresses.
A musical has a much greater sense of immediacy, a much easier time conveying humanity in its characters, and a much lower tolerance for anything that slows down the plot; so Schwartz and Holtzman concentrate on the growing relationship between Elpheba and Galinda. There's one clear villain, and everybody else is simply taking action to achieve his or her personal goals.
So, if you had to condense the plots of the novel and of the play into a couple of sentences each, you'd likely get similar synopses. But they're about different things.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
And strangely - I wanted the book to have more pictures. It was difficult to visualize some of what was going on. I am not sure what that says about me.
Reply
I recently realized that the first seven notes in the musical's number "Unlimited" are also the first seven notes -- with a different rhythm and chord progression -- as "Somewhere Over the Rainbow".
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment