Leave a comment

Comments 4

pixel39 September 20 2010, 18:44:13 UTC
Teeny teeny stitches. If you make chain stitch small enough it can do that. I've done it. I haven't *liked* it, but I've done it.

Also--probably made by someone for whom embroidery was their day job, which means that they had lots of practice.

Reply


caoilfhionn September 20 2010, 18:54:25 UTC
I'll second the teeny-tiny stitches and add really fine thread. I didn't believe it either until I tried different thicknesses for a commission a while back.

In the end, though, I often stick with split because I find chain stitches a pain to make. Nyah.

Reply


lostvirtue September 20 2010, 20:52:51 UTC
It's impossible for me to tell from that image what stitch that is, but I'm actually voting with you since I do a crap ton of split stitch work to get lots of detail. I only use one strand of thread and while it's theoretically possible to make chain stitch that small I'm almost doubting there are enough strands in the linen, I even have a hard time with that and split stitch at times. I mean you'd literally be having use use the hole next to the one you are using to get a chain stitch that small I think.

Reply


valleyviolet September 21 2010, 20:25:13 UTC
Anything you can do with a straight stitch you can do with terrifyingly tiny chain stitches. I'm constantly amazed by some of the examples in the 19th century garments I have photos of.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up