(Untitled)

Oct 28, 2005 09:29

art should have never been given a name.

Leave a comment

Comments 3

hotrodnothing October 28 2005, 15:18:13 UTC
Agreed, it is too confining to the medium.

Reply


anonymous October 29 2005, 17:49:02 UTC
small font. check. ahem... art is like... some motherfuckers who reject the cynicism of the modern world and instead overcompensate by hanging on every feeling and impression they encounter and sharing these things with others. i wouldn't be surprised if they thought everything they did was profound in a sense, but it's a self-inflicted catch-22 of "mature" artistic types never to admit it, to themselves or others. artists thus confine themselves to a life of vulnerability, selfishness, and a perpetual search for satisfaction that never reaches conclusion. or i could just be full of shit.

Reply


bartholomew. anonymous November 18 2005, 12:07:12 UTC
self-reference. check. what about naming it gertrude. that, with no desire to offend, is an abhorrent name. or something equally repellent. like geoff. actually. ignore that part about having no desire to offend.

yours sincerely,  x

Reply


Leave a comment

Up