(Untitled)

May 28, 2006 22:26

to anyone who knows anything about art ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

Comments 6

silvermist7 May 29 2006, 03:13:55 UTC
second group

first one: realism, at the time painted, women had to wait for men to return
second one: naturalism, cause it is nature

Reply

commentary! jadedinoblivion May 29 2006, 04:28:37 UTC
first one: true, and a good point, however the setting isn't conventional in the way that realism was portrayed at the time. the colors are much more ideal, dramatic even, then a realist would use, which is why Friedrich is generally considered to be a romantic.

Reply


jadedinoblivion May 29 2006, 04:23:59 UTC
Group Two: (I like these more)

First: romanticism, as it invokes strong emotion (longing, waiting, transition [which you could connect to the time period- i should Think that this is 18th century work- so depending on the country of the painter they might have been experiencing territorial expansion- and you probably should mention the fact that this painting is clearly anti-enlightenment)

(also, friedrich is a well-known romantic painter :P)

Second: Naturalism, as it takes place in a realistic natural setting. Though this particular genre kind of bleeds into realism. You know that it's naturalism as opposed to, say, romanticism because it's both less stylized and depicts a pleasantly dull nature scene. It's rather devoid of imagination- Yes, it's pretty, but it doesn't make you think in the same way as say the first picture.

Reply


_walk_softly_ May 29 2006, 15:22:55 UTC
The first group defintely present a pair of Realist paintings. The subject matter is the first tip-off, and the style of painting is the second.

The second group I've call Romantic. Both picture idealized landscapes and situations and both majorly concern nature.

Reply


diabolic May 30 2006, 02:54:16 UTC
how long was this expected to be?

Reply

rissque May 30 2006, 03:07:22 UTC
i'm guessing 5 paragraphs, more than a page double spaced

Reply


Leave a comment

Up