Leave a comment

Comments 6

(The comment has been removed)

ryanlion August 19 2008, 23:31:53 UTC
Yeah, the stuff on their website isn't as good as what's in this video.
The demos on their website are clearly CG, impressive, but CG.

The eyes in the above video are a little flat, but I was also looking at the natrual looking hand gestures and the shoulder shrug that her clothes react to.

There are a lot of little things to pick apart, like her mouth doesn't exactly match the words she's saying. Still it's pretty damn good.

Reply


liquidambar August 19 2008, 23:21:37 UTC
The thing is, the resolution on a YouTube clip is so lousy it's hard to judge how well this would work at photo quality or on a big screen.

Reply

ryanlion August 19 2008, 23:27:42 UTC
If you go to YouTube, instead of watching the clip in my journal, there is a higher res version. Under the views counter there's a link to 'watch it in high quality'.

I think it's still not good enough to look completely real on a movie screen, but it's a lot closer than anything I've seen before.

Reply


chiaspod August 20 2008, 00:02:15 UTC
She's hot. Think they do full-body scans?

Reply

seedmoon August 20 2008, 01:06:40 UTC
Yes and have they developed that full body user sensory interface yet?

Seriously though, impressive stuff.

Reply


ex_maclean241 August 20 2008, 19:09:25 UTC
Wow!

Reply


Leave a comment

Up