Numerology

Feb 24, 2009 22:13

So I was trying to design a bead pattern (rosary) and when I do this I generally use my numerology number (which is 3) as a guideline. And it got me thinking "What is Jesus' number?" Since my religion says he was born December 25th I went off of that date. Well, to add MORE numbers to the mix, I had to discover what year he was born. But he was ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

Comments 3

flickerflash February 27 2009, 20:43:23 UTC
The number "1" in numerology has absolutely nothing to do with the idea of everything revolving around you if your number reduces to that, and just for the record, 'scientists' believe Jesus was born more around the time of early spring. There is no for sure 100% beyond a shadow of a doubt record for his birth date. The reason is science can not yet prove if he has actually existed. There are no remains and things of that nature.

Reply

rythmicjea February 28 2009, 00:59:49 UTC
Wow, did you really go there? I don't try to disprove YOUR religion so why are you trying to disprove mine? Also I said in the post "Going by the birthday 12/25" meaning that is the day we celebrate not his actual birthday. Astrology is so vague that people seem to follow traits of a sign that they weren't born under. My grandfather for example, is an Aries and acts NOTHING like one.

And since you probably know this, I thought I would remind you of the characteristics of a person with the numerology number 1.

The Number One, 1, is a pillar. A phallic shape. The one is a masculine energy that strikes out on its own and pioneers what is new, original, and seething with energy. This One is the irreducible fact of consciousness, the eternal I AM.
The Number One Skills Extraordinary leadership skills, very ambitious, driven, goal-oriented, strong will power, courageous, unconventional, inventive, creative, original, pioneer, unique approach to problems, independent, individualistic, great potential for success ( ... )

Reply

flickerflash February 28 2009, 03:47:09 UTC
Astrology is as vague as our scientific understanding of the universe. And as I've told many people who don't think their sign accurately 'describes' them, maybe if they knew all three of their signs it would make a little more sense. As for the historian, I'm pretty sure if he did prove anything it would have been that there was someone named Jesus. He had no proof of anything that someone was a messiah or son of god.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up