Yeah, here you go people. Links to personality test stuff for those that would like to try them. You can try one or the other, but I think you should probably shouldn't trust the results of the bloginality test, as it is far too short.
Jung Typology Test Bloginality Once you have a result, I recommend going over to this site to check out the
(
Read more... )
Comments 11
Introverted Intuitive Feeling Perceiving
Strength of the preferences %
89 25 25 11
At any rate, my brain is fuzzy today, but tomorrow I'm' doing the diagram for spiritual gifts and I'm working on this. It'll be good for zee brain, no?
Reply
Hmm. I think, honestly, that INFP's are more prone to writing in online journals. There were way more of them (at least on that bloginality site) than other types.
Did you take the Jung, the Bloginality, or both?
Reply
"You are an ISTJ!
As an ISTJ, you are Intraverted, Sensing, Thinking, and Judging.
This makes your primary focus on Introverted Sensing with Extraverted Thinking.
This is defined as a SJ personality, which is part of Carl Jung's Guardian (Security Seeking) type, and more specifically the Inspectors or Duty Fufiller.
As a weblogger, you may will have a dependable form of posting. You may be more likely to be judgementatal toward others who aren't as dependable. You may get taken advantage of in group situations because you are known as not being able to say no. Because of your respect for facts and information, you may need multiple blogs to keep all of the information sorted in your head."As you stated, I think the Bloginality test is much less dependable. Too much of a general group of answers to be entirely accurate. I took a personality test last November, and I received ISFJ (the same as adira_jade). This was the Jung typology ( ... )
Reply
*Booming voice* Fear me ye flip-flopping, level-headed, and open-minded "moderates," for I am the thorn in your flesh, and the bane of your existence! I deserve to be killed, or at very least, brain-washed until I become like you. Haha, who's the "extremist" NOW?
Yeah, I truly don't know where that came from...
Still...the "strength of the preferences" could be because I've taken the test before and stuff, and I'm more prone to answering just to get that same type again. At least, that could be one reason why (or I could just be a terrorist).
Introverted Intuitive Feeling Perceiving
Strength of the preferences %
78 88 38 89
Reply
Reply
Extroverted Sensing Feeling Judging
Strength of the preferences %
1 12 38 39
Seems i'm a polar opposite.
Reply
I've been alright. Thanks for asking. I got a new job a month ago, and have been pretty busy with that. Also, you haven't seen me on CAA, but neither has anyone else. My last post was almost 60 days ago. I hope to remedy that soon, but for the time being, I've been too tired to make a thoughtful post, and I'm usually not one to spam up the boards for the sake of spamming. Yeah, it's been a while since I saw you, but that's probably because I don't much use MSN messenger much anymore either. Yeah, good to see you're still around and active on the boards and stuff, and maybe we can talk soon. See ya round Carla...
Reply
Introverted Sensing Feeling Judging
Strength of the preferences %
78 50 38 1
Reply
Introverted-89%
Sensing-44%
Feeling-11%
Judging-1%
I guess I have done a bit of changing...
Reply
Seriously though...your change probably just came from a lot of growth over the months. I mean...I know everyone SHOULD be an INFP like me...but for some reason they just haven't grown as much as you, me, or Annette.
Yeah. Just kidding. Variety is the spice of life. Really. Life would be boring with a ton of clones. That, and God made everyone special, regardless of what any test may say.
Reply
Leave a comment