I'm honestly curious as to what answer they gave, and also if anyone tries using this for pub quizzes with the usual rules of "the answer I give is right even if I can be proved wrong" will there be a riot?
The answer they gave was "no". I think this is understandable, if a little conservative, and really they can't prove that they didn't.
The advantage of drawing animals on the sides of caves is that the canvas doesn't wander off to eat interesting looking trees. This may have been an early abortive experiment in the history of art.
Comments 6
I'm honestly curious as to what answer they gave, and also if anyone tries using this for pub quizzes with the usual rules of "the answer I give is right even if I can be proved wrong" will there be a riot?
Reply
The advantage of drawing animals on the sides of caves is that the canvas doesn't wander off to eat interesting looking trees. This may have been an early abortive experiment in the history of art.
Reply
Reply
Is that acceptable as an answer, or are they looking for something more educated like
A: No, they drew pictures of animals on sides of caves
Alternatively
A: No, the women did
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment