There's some debate at how well conventional speed-reading techniques really work. You've probably heard the classic Woody Allen line, "I took a speed reading course and read 'War and Peace' in twenty minutes. It involves Russia
( Read more... )
I first encountered this concept back in the late 1990s using a single-character, not single-word, reader. Amazingly high speeds were quite comprehensible.
I'm guessing it was done that way to prove a point rather than because they couldn't manage whole words, right?
If you'd like to play with RSVP, another option, besides that flawed Firefox add-on I mentioned, is the free trial version of AceReader from Stepware (http://www.acereader.com/), which has an RSVP module.
I suggested to Tom Becker that maybe he could develop an iPhone/iPod/iPad RSVP app. We'll see if he finds the time.
"I'm guessing it was done that way to prove a point rather than because they couldn't manage whole words, right?"
Right. The idea behind fixed-point reading is to reduce unnecessary eye movement as one reads. Words are of such tremendously different widths that it takes more time to process them than to process a single character.
Comments 3
Reply
I'm guessing it was done that way to prove a point rather than because they couldn't manage whole words, right?
If you'd like to play with RSVP, another option, besides that flawed Firefox add-on I mentioned, is the free trial version of AceReader from Stepware (http://www.acereader.com/), which has an RSVP module.
I suggested to Tom Becker that maybe he could develop an iPhone/iPod/iPad RSVP app. We'll see if he finds the time.
Reply
Right. The idea behind fixed-point reading is to reduce unnecessary eye movement as one reads. Words are of such tremendously different widths that it takes more time to process them than to process a single character.
Reply
Leave a comment