N-Things Meme: Elements

May 18, 2019 12:22

I keep talking about a certain elemental mapping scheme a lot, assuming everyone shared this cultural vision. Apparently there’s a lot of disagreement about what the various mapping schemes are, and I may be rather an outlier. So, here’s by best attempt to put it into words for future reference.
Read more... )

Leave a comment

Comments 15

reversepolarity May 18 2012, 19:27:35 UTC
The Cowboy Bebop analogy is perfect.

I mean, there's even that episode where Jet goes on about flowing like water in martial arts. So cool.

Reply

sandmantv May 18 2012, 19:29:28 UTC
s/jet/spike

And I agree! I even linked that scene earlier as one of the defining things for what I see in Water. http://sandmantv.livejournal.com/89386.html

: )

Also, man you read/post fast.

Reply

reversepolarity May 18 2012, 19:32:46 UTC
Ack I totally don't know how to write. I meant Spike. Spiiiiiiiiiiike.

I had also just refreshed LJ when you posted. :3

Reply

sandmantv May 18 2012, 19:53:25 UTC
Also to be clear, the perfection of the analogy isn't my doing, so much as "the authors clearly intended this".

Reply


theevilgenius May 18 2012, 20:02:24 UTC
I have no idea why those conversations are element specific. For example, it's entirely possible that some person would tell fire any and all of those three things.

EDIT: Furthermore, I would think that I, personally, would be far more likely to say, "Don't put me in a box," to earth than water. There continue to be multiple things I find questionable about this, is what I'm saying.

Reply

sandmantv May 18 2012, 20:09:17 UTC
This kind of gets to a philosophy I have with mapping schemes: they are far more empirical than they are ontological. Yes it’s possible anything, it just turns out that (in my estimation) this is what most people do. In the case you highlighted, Air people think Fire are too quick to commit, while Water people think Fire people are too blind to their surroundings and effects. These dialogues say something about both parties. It’s ontologically possible that someone would mix and match, and so the very fact that empirically speaking people don’t, is pretty interesting (or at least, that people statistically cluster around sets of these interactions ( ... )

Reply

sandmantv May 18 2012, 20:10:12 UTC
I'm collecting data on Earth - Air interactions, as my foot note says.

And we've certainly discussed what ones opinion ABOUT mapping schemes says....

Reply

midnight_sidhe May 18 2012, 21:42:35 UTC
"General mutual unintelligibility," I maintain.

Reply


boojum42 May 18 2012, 22:40:15 UTC
Based on your definitions, I maintain that I am not remotely a fire person. I just like pretending to be one in games.

Reply


novalis May 19 2012, 01:07:50 UTC
I don't know whether I'm earth or fire. An old girlfriend once described me as water, and, although I don't remember the details, I do remember that her description of water did not match yours.

Reply


tilivenn May 19 2012, 17:43:41 UTC
My conclusions: in this scheme, I am actually earth, but am fairly certain that it is more functional to be water or perhaps fire. Those philosophical ideals that I hold to so tenaciously tell me that you shouldn't hold tenaciously to things and that truth isn't carved in stone. So. Um. Yeah, well.

Reply

sandmantv May 19 2012, 17:48:28 UTC
Thanks! I'm pretty sure I'm glad we have a diverse array of friends of all types, to be clear. Plus this could be a mapping scheme that's all relative, and say, we need to look at everyone through an Earth filter or something. I don't know.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up