what an amazing movie. first blush impressions provoke me to say things like "this is one of my new favorite movies." does this pass the "michael would buy this so he can rewatch it whenever the mood so strikes him" test? yes, yes it does.
i'm not really in a mood to do my own review now especially since i've read
( Read more... )
The harbingers are come. See, see their mark; White is their colour, and behold my head. Long gone the smoke-and-pepper childhood smell
( Read more... )
reading dred scott v. sanford makes me want to puke in anger. it's hard to read it dispassionately for the quality or lack thereof of purely legal constitutional argumentation. lots of historical arguments, textual arguments, some structural arguments.
oh yes, and one particularly charming example of a prudential/historic argument: