Ah, but to cite the inherently fallible nature of humans to justify the means of an end is to accept that no human is capable of free thought. How very Skinnerian of you Sara.
Or, do we conjure intrinsic morality and cite that it is our nature to persue the elimination of such foibles and cull the ascended thoughts within our consciousness which elevate us to places much higher?
In other words, are you making admission to being nothing more than a flawed and uncontrolled object within an elaborate mesh of highly specific conditioning incapable of ever being more than something which is "faulibe"? Or are you admitting that you are indeed flawed and possess not the ability to nurture elevated thought processes which lift the mind above that of a flawed, cultural play-thing?
Comments 2
Reply
Or, do we conjure intrinsic morality and cite that it is our nature to persue the elimination of such foibles and cull the ascended thoughts within our consciousness which elevate us to places much higher?
In other words, are you making admission to being nothing more than a flawed and uncontrolled object within an elaborate mesh of highly specific conditioning incapable of ever being more than something which is "faulibe"? Or are you admitting that you are indeed flawed and possess not the ability to nurture elevated thought processes which lift the mind above that of a flawed, cultural play-thing?
Reply
Leave a comment