Spot on. Christian Bale was painful to look at, which worked very well. I really liked the use of imagery and colour (or lack thereof) throughout the film. The performances worked very well together. Usually, I think it is a very good sign if a film forces me to keep thinking about it and different aspects of it keep occurring to me for some time afterwards. Not before bed, though.
I was thinking about it on the way home this morning - I loved the repetitive imagery of hanged men and hands, and without wishing to spoil it for those who haven't yet seen it, I didn't realise quite how significant the fairground ride was until afterwards.
I think it was second-guessable, which isn't quite the same. It was possible to stay a step or two ahead of the story, but I wouldn't necessarily say that was a bad thing. I had guessed the twist of The Sixth Sense fairly early on, but it didn't detract from my enjoyment of the film.
I would go with second-guessable as well. The plot was secondary, to my mind. They take a bit of a blunt instrument approach to leading us in the wrong direction. The acting and imagery were high quality, though. Films do not combine verbal and visual imagery as effectively as this often enough.
That's true. A lot of films (though I still can't think of a specific one off the top of my head, which is bugging me) seem to set out to do similar, and get it wrong. Christian Bale's performance hit the fine line between believably screwed-up and totally insane absolutely perfectly.
A film. eddie777 and I went to see it last night, and we had to watch an episode of 'Family Guy' afterwards to bring about mind wind-down, as it was such a headfuck.
Comments 37
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Was the cake icon deliberate? ;-)
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment