The Machinist.

Apr 14, 2005 09:38

In a word: disturbing.

Leave a comment

Comments 37

asw909 April 14 2005, 08:51:30 UTC
Ah, thanks for reminding me. May go see that this weekend.

Reply

sarcaustik April 14 2005, 08:53:03 UTC
I would recommend it, but not immediately before bed. Have something fluffy to watch afterwards.

Reply

eddie777 April 14 2005, 08:59:39 UTC
Spot on. Christian Bale was painful to look at, which worked very well. I really liked the use of imagery and colour (or lack thereof) throughout the film. The performances worked very well together. Usually, I think it is a very good sign if a film forces me to keep thinking about it and different aspects of it keep occurring to me for some time afterwards. Not before bed, though.

Reply

sarcaustik April 14 2005, 11:14:33 UTC
I was thinking about it on the way home this morning - I loved the repetitive imagery of hanged men and hands, and without wishing to spoil it for those who haven't yet seen it, I didn't realise quite how significant the fairground ride was until afterwards.

Reply


(The comment has been removed)

sarcaustik April 14 2005, 11:15:12 UTC
Made me wonder if I'd lose that much weight if I didn't sleep for a year! ;-)

Reply


ivory_goddess April 14 2005, 08:58:45 UTC
The pictures accompanying the reviews are disturbing enough!

Reply

sarcaustik April 14 2005, 11:16:16 UTC
Yeah - it's an uncomfortable film to watch, but it has been a long time since I've seen anything that was both challenging and compelling.

Reply


hazyjayne April 14 2005, 09:07:20 UTC
I would say: predictable...

Reply

sarcaustik April 14 2005, 11:18:23 UTC
I think it was second-guessable, which isn't quite the same. It was possible to stay a step or two ahead of the story, but I wouldn't necessarily say that was a bad thing. I had guessed the twist of The Sixth Sense fairly early on, but it didn't detract from my enjoyment of the film.

Was the cake icon deliberate? ;-)

Reply

eddie777 April 14 2005, 11:28:12 UTC
I would go with second-guessable as well. The plot was secondary, to my mind. They take a bit of a blunt instrument approach to leading us in the wrong direction. The acting and imagery were high quality, though. Films do not combine verbal and visual imagery as effectively as this often enough.

Reply

sarcaustik April 14 2005, 11:56:16 UTC
That's true. A lot of films (though I still can't think of a specific one off the top of my head, which is bugging me) seem to set out to do similar, and get it wrong. Christian Bale's performance hit the fine line between believably screwed-up and totally insane absolutely perfectly.

Reply


steer April 14 2005, 09:17:03 UTC
What is it?

Reply

sarcaustik April 14 2005, 11:21:27 UTC
A film. eddie777 and I went to see it last night, and we had to watch an episode of 'Family Guy' afterwards to bring about mind wind-down, as it was such a headfuck.

Reply

steer April 14 2005, 11:37:52 UTC
Ah... so long since I've been to the pictures I don't even know what the films are called or who the actors are any more.

Reply

sarcaustik April 14 2005, 11:39:45 UTC
If it helps, I usually fancy Christian Bale. I didn't in this film though.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up