ARGH.

Aug 12, 2008 16:38

That's a real piss-off. I feel bad for the poor kid who had the great voice but didn't get to go on stage because the director didn't think she LOOKED the part. :Phttp://ca.news.yahoo.com/indepth/olympics/s/afp/080812/world/

Leave a comment

Comments 6

sn0wkitty August 12 2008, 23:29:54 UTC
I feel sorry for her too. I can't say that this really surprises me.

Reply


daunicorn August 13 2008, 03:50:06 UTC
I understand ppl upset but how is this different then when in a movie they have an actor play the role and then use a different voice actor?

Reply

sasuran August 13 2008, 12:26:13 UTC
*nods* There's a lot of similarities to Hollywood. However, there are still some key differences.

First, it is rare to have someone cast for something and to use a different voice. (Consider the huge controversy with Duran Duran or when Britney Speares was found to be lip-syncing). Generally, they settle for a person who is 'acceptable' in two categories (looks and voice/acting skill/whatever). So, in auditions, the market, or whatever, you're never exactly sure why one does well and one does poorly - we assume looks, but we don't 'know' per se. (I'm a MeatLoaf fan, and I'm sorry, that man ain't pretty).

In this case, they've actually told A KID, "No, you /are/ the best singer, you're just not pretty enough to represent our country" - AND THEN ADVERTISED IT TO THE WORLD. >.< A KID ( ... )

Reply

daunicorn August 13 2008, 12:51:02 UTC
Agreed but the opening ceremony is supposed to be representative of the country running the Olympics. If one takes this in both a positive light and a negative light this is representative of China. In a positive light it show how many can come together swallow there pride and create something better than any one individual could. On the other hand it shows how the government is more concerned with appearances than people. Either way representative of the idea China is trying to achieve or the reality.

Beyond that I agree with that except "AND THEN ADVERTISED IT TO THE WORLD. >.< A KID." China was trying to hide that fact and people only found out because the coordinator felt the world should know about the real singer.

Reply

sasuran August 13 2008, 13:13:43 UTC
See, I still feel bad for the kid, though.

And it'd be wrong either way. I think letting people know about it because of the moral implications is for the greater good, but I still feel bad for the kid. I hate how the Chinese government tries to cover everything up. ARGH.

And yeah; it definitely is meant to represent the culture. But I've never been a fan of a government that sacrifies its own people for the sake of appearances. :P ARGH. (Really, I'm just not a fan of the Chinese governmetn, at the end of the day).

Admittedly, the Chinese people are presumably supporting this, and I mean, if they think it's best and the kid's feelings aren't hurt, then I guess it wouldn't be so bad.

Of course, it's hard to get a pulse for that when the government runs its people down with tanks and controls the media.

>.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up