I heard about that one. Kinda weird, no? What are your thoughts about that? At first I thought they should circumsize him if he really was having infections and irritation all the time, pretty gross not to do something about it and the father seemed petty and foolish not to try to help his son. But maybe the mother had ulterior motives and the operation really isn't all that necessary? Either way, I can't believe they had to take this all the way to court. Bah.
The Mother Should Be Circumcised Not The Kid
anonymous
October 31 2006, 00:00:48 UTC
A child's foreskin should NEVER be forcibly retracted for any reason. Attempting to retract the foreskin while it's still attached to the head (as it is in most young children) usually results in bleeding and inflammation.
The Reuters version of this story said that the boy's mother had repeatedly retracted his foreskin in order to "clean" underneath it thereby causing his penis to become inflamed. In other words, this woman created the kid's problem in the first place and now she wants him to suffer through a circumcision because of her stupidity.
No wonder she lost the case. She should've been prosecuted for abuse.
Comments 4
Reply
Reply
;)
Reply
The Reuters version of this story said that the boy's mother had repeatedly retracted his foreskin in order to "clean" underneath it thereby causing his penis to become inflamed. In other words, this woman created the kid's problem in the first place and now she wants him to suffer through a circumcision because of her stupidity.
No wonder she lost the case. She should've been prosecuted for abuse.
Reply
Leave a comment