(Untitled)

[saturn_cerulean]

"abstract = paintings for painters who cant paint"

This said by one of the least talented, uncreative "artists" I know!

lols all around!

Comments

[sadmonkey112]

Obviously this person has never experienced my genius.

[arandomvandal]

Well, I'm not the most talented painter, and I could never come up with an abstraction that looked like something you'd see in a museum.. I always used to think that impressionism and other painterly genres were for people who couldn't manage realism... but now I'm fairly cerain that no matter what genre you paint, if you're good at it, it'll show.. if you're not good, it'll still be pretty obvious.. /rambleramble

[question_0]

On the contrary. You see abstract is partly what behind the painting, like Jackson Pollock his life was regurgitated on the canvass and you can really see it also he was part of the original artists to do anything that abstract. There is also a lot of different processes that are involved with any abstract art with merrit. To put it short, you still have to be tallented to choose to go away from subject matter. I can spot a painter who doesn't know how to paint from a mile away abstract or not.